Public park and community garden: urban green as a bond cohere environment with people

Public park a environment with group memory ���

Pubic park and community garden, as one of the most common public place and urban green infrastructure, provides both culture services and ecological service in cities. However, due to the deterioration of the urban environment, people tend to focus on ecological functions of building parks and public gardens, while often overlook the particular and unique sociological factors of the field. But if urban space wants to stay resilient and long-lasting, human factors and historical factors can’t be separated from geographical and environmental factors. Tadao Ando, a prominent architect ever said, “The most important value of urban culture depends on the fact that as the group memory shared by people, it will go beyond the times based on particular shared memory of a group of local people.” So when designing urban green parks and gardens, it not only need to take into account importance of the natural environment, but also consider about the needs of local residents and the echo with history and culture. Only in this way urban public space can be sustainable and resilient.

As a type of urban green, public park and community garden offer a diversified ecosystem services include provisioning services and regulating and supporting services. Parks and public gardens under a size of 2.5 hectares are included in this category. They are one of the most effective measures to reduce urban effects and increase biodiversity. Planting big trees and bushes in parks and gardens can provide shade, reduce surface heat absorption, increase oxygen supply, and contribute to soil water storage. In the flood and rainy season, they are very helpful for alleviating the flow speed of surface water. In addition, they can offer a living space for a wide variety of organisms, especially for insects and small mammals. Green vegetation can provide them with a good rest, concealment and breeding space.

But after talking about significance of environmentalism and regionalism of public green space, how can we design a good one for Leiden that meets both ecological needs and local characteristics? As a Dutch city with a long history, Leiden has a wealth of human and natural resources. It is a city that must be passed from the Hague (political center of the Netherlands) to Amsterdam (International center of the Netherlands), and it have the oldest university of the Netherlands (Leiden University). In addition, Leiden used to have a prosperous textile industry, and contains developed canal distribution and urban planning, which made business once prosperous. Since before, countless scholars and businessmen have visited here and have been made it as a culture and history centre.

Image result for leiden history

Till today, thousands of students, tourists and different kind of people visit Leiden everyday. So if there is going to build public parks and community gardens in and around the Lorentz building, in which it will become the landmark building right next Leiden Central station, what kind of green space design can be the most suitable to this fascinating city. In order to solve this problem, I think the first step is to understand people’s expectations for the green infrastructure. Do they agree to build such a public space? How’s the green space of Leiden should be look like? And what they want to do in this land? After understanding this, and combine with the history background and geographical conditions, the design of public park and community garden of the Lorentz building must be unique and excellent. After all, the vitality and diverse atmosphere of a city are always cultivated by the residents themselves.

3 thoughts on “Public park and community garden: urban green as a bond cohere environment with people”

  1. Hi there! Cool post on the different approaches to design green spaces in the city of Leiden! I completely agree with you that the spaces should be shaped in line with the cultural and historical background of a city. However, I’m not really convinced whether the expectations of locals should be more important than the ecological aspects of a green space since the green spaces are such vulnerable places in terms of resilience. So, to what extent do you think people should be involved involved in the process? The complete design of it or just the aesthetics? And who would you ask? Those who pass it everyday (those who perhaps don’t live in Leiden) or who live in the city, and then the younger or the elder?
    Curious to hear your thoughts!

    Like

  2. Hello! I like that you put links, quotes, and pictures in your post, that makes it more attractive to read. I have a question about the urban green you talk about; putting more trees/bushes/other types of vegetation in parks and gardens. That is indeed a very good idea for all the reasons you mentioned, but my question is what it has to do directly with the Lorentz building. It only becomes clear in the last paragraph that the Lorentz building is the ‘real’ problem you are talking about, and you don’t really give an answer to the question you pose in this paragraph. I would like to know more about this question and maybe a bit less about the urban green theories if they are not directly connected to the problem.

    Like

  3. I really like the take on public spaces as a kind of “shared memory”. It gives an extra importance to public space and an extra dimension to questions about urban green. Your blog invites to ponder on the subject. Although I think it is an super interesting question you pose, I’d like some more suggestions for solutions. You kept this part very vague. For me it only raised more questions. For example to what extend would you include residents/users? And who else would you include in the process?

    Like

Comments are closed.