Thinking out of the (green) box

When we think of renewable energy sources, we can all come up with a few alternatives for the unsustainable fossil fuels we still use nowadays. Think about for example, solar panels, wind turbines and hydropower. The alternatives for non-renewable energy sources are already here, however the world does not succeed in implementing these new forms of energy rapidly nor at low costs. Especially in urban areas, the realization of switching to green energy is quite difficult. This is because large projects with great impact are difficult or impossible to apply to urban areas. Giant wind turbines are obviously not suited for the city centre. Another example is that putting solar panels on every free inch of roof in the city is not considered as an improvement on the picturesque townscape.

The characteristics of urban areas are therefor, in terms of the development of sustainable energy, rather problematic. On the one hand, 50% of the world population lives in cities and this percentage is ever growing. On the other hand, cities leave little to no room for efficient renewable energy sources. This can be understood quite literally, as there is no space left for large renewable sources in densely populated cities. But also, municipalities have regulations of what is allowed in a city and what is not. For example, you cannot just place a solar panel on your roof; you have to take into account some basic rules. As for, the wind turbines, no one would be surprised that the municipality has made rules on that topic, since no one would be thrilled to have an energy generator the size of the Statue of Liberty in their backyard.

Now, what would work for a municipality like Leiden? First of all, it would not be a bad idea to liberalize some regulations concerning implementing renewable energy sources in the city. To take the cliché solar panels as an example again, to make an impact in producing energy with those, we might even think about covering the sidewalks with solar panels, let alone the roofs!

This would not be convenient, which is why I suggest for us to think out of the box. Cities need smaller projects that are adapted to the characteristics of urban areas. My favourite example of something like that are algae fuels. Algae organisms convert sunlight to energy and the plants can grow in various environments. What is beneficial to us is that algae can be converted into different types of fuels and that the burning of algae is CO2-neutral, since the plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere in order to perform photosynthesis and grow. One day, perhaps when we are able to maintain algae under different weather conditions, we can grow algae in the canals of Leiden!

U.S. Department of Energy

http://www.wageningenur.nl/nl/Onderzoek-Resultaten/Projecten/Agromere/Stadslandbouw-1.htm

http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/cities2009.pdf

http://www.allesoverzonnepanelen.nl/voorwaarden/vergunningen/

http://energy.gov/articles/3-reasons-we-re-closer-algae-future-you-think

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Thinking out of the (green) box”

  1. HI! I like the idea of “thinking out of the box” for new ideas of green energy. Ofcourse we don’t have to stick to solar panels and wind turbines to produce green energy. There are a lot of different options who would maybe work even better. The only thing I am worried about is the ability of the citizens of Leiden to think that much out of the box. The citizens love their canals and is attracts a lot of tourists, what is important for the economy. I wonder if everybody would support the “green canals” because I can imagine it will look kind of gross. But maybe it can be applyed on canals who are a little bit less in the center, like the one at the Witte Singel.

    Like

  2. I really like the title thinking out of the box! I would have loved to red more about other ideas than only algae. Do you maybe have other examples as well? Did you know that in Germany they even build a house surrounded by algae ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay-cPZZOxxk Here a video about it). The algae feeds the house with energy. Unfortunately you need a lot of sun hours to receive enough energy to sustain a household.

    Like

  3. Hi Jozefien, your introduction really grabbed my attention. I like the idea of growing algae in the canals for green energy. Such alternatives fits better within the limited space we have in city centres!

    However, in terms of built-up areas like Leiden, I’m wondering whether we have enough sunlight in the canals to grow algae. A lot of sunlight is required to generate high productivities of algae biomass and the canals are mainly situated in the shade of city buildings. Maybe we can use the canals outside the city centre as Benthe already mentioned or the lakes of Valkenburg and the Kaag?

    Like

  4. I think this is a very smart use of algae in creating renewable energy. I think this will not only be very beneficial to saving the environment, also I think Leiden will receive a lot of positive reactions to this, attracting a lot of governments to do the same! However the canals in Leiden also sadly have a lot of garbage floating in it, I wonder if this would interfere with the algae growth and decease the effectiveness? Also it says the right environment is needed, however Leiden has quite varying weather from summer to winter. Would this mean that the algae would only be effective certain time periods? Or can it adjust to different weather types?

    Like

Comments are closed.